Region: Europe      US   Asia   India   Australia
You are not logged in    Login
IDS Packaging
The Information Resource for the Packaging Industry!
Browse Packaging Products and Suppliers By Category
Browse Packaging Whitepapers By Sector
Browse Packaging Events By Category
Participation Options
Free Listing
Interested in Exhibiting
SubmitEvents
IDS Packaging
Submit News
Packaging Newsletter
News ReleaseClick Here to view News Releases
Franklin Life Cycle Inventory Research
April 28, 2008
Click HereView Participation Packages
Click Here
Add your Listing

Zip-Pak’s most recent research study, conducted by Franklin Associates, an independent third party research firm, demonstrates that flexible packaging is a more sustainable alternative than rigid packaging formats. The study included eight packaging systems:

- Six deli meat packages
- One package featured a resealable closure manufactured by Zip-Pak on a flexible pouch.
- The five other packages are qualified as rigid containers manufactured by companies unaffiliated with Zip-Pak.
- Two breakfast cereal packages
- One package featured a resealable closure manufactured by Zip-Pak on a flexible pouch.
- One package utilized a bag-in-box format manufactured by a company unaffiliated with Zip-Pak.

Key Findings

Fact: The Deli meat package in a flexible pouch with a resealable closure was found to have the lowest energy consumption, solid waste generation, and greenhouse gas emissions of the six deli meat packaging systems included in this analysis.

Fact: The breakfast cereal package in a flexible pouch with a resealable closure had the lowest energy consumption, solid waste generation, and greenhouse gas emissions of the two breakfast cereal packaging systems included in this analysis.

Fact: Transportation energy accounted for less than 17 percent of total energy for all systems, however, the life cycle results show that the transportation energy requirements for the reusable container systems are higher than for the flexible packaging systems.

This research demonstrates the smaller environmental footprint of flexible resealable packaging as compared with rigid packaging for the same product type due to:

- Superior product-to-package ratio
- Lower energy footprint
- Lower solid waste footprint
- Lower greenhouse gas emissions

For more information on the Franklin Research Study or to speak with a Zip-Pak representative, please contact Christina Nuzio at +1 212-529-4500 or at CNuzio@abipr.com.

Other News
Flexible Packaging Company Gets Renewable Energy
NatureFlex™ Part of Packaging First Down Under
New updates for 2008 Sino-American Flexible Packaging & Film Development Symposium
Consumer Packaging Conference Now Boasts 65+ Sessions
PARC to Develop Sensor Tape Technology to Track Exposure to Explosive Blasts
Featured Whitepaper
Simple Carton Cost Savings Ideas for Your Carton

The paper would break down ways to control costs on folding cartons. The paper wou...

                     Read more

 

DVI European Plastics Converters EUROPEN Institute Of Packaging UK
DELEGATES
33442
Conference Sectors  Case Studies  List of Papers  Exhibition Sectors  Vendor Presentation  List of Exhibitors  Industry News  Sponsors  All Exhibitors  All Papers  Sitemap  Registration Links ]

 :: IDS Emergency Management :: IDS Water ::IDS Publishing / Media::IDS Healthcare Management::IDS Environment::IDS Plastics::IDS Power/Energy:: 

Industry IDS, Inc. – Online Tradeshow, Exhibition, & Buyers Guide Solutions